বুধবার, ১৭ জুলাই, ২০১৩

'Dome' still a hit, helping CBS to a win last week

NEW YORK (AP) ? CBS' "Under the Dome" was the favorite gathering spot for viewers last week, keeping this summer replacement thriller ahead of the pack for its third airing.

But nipping at its heels was the Wednesday edition of NBC's "America's Got Talent," which attracted 10.707 million viewers ? just 2,000 fewer than saw "Under the Dome." The Tuesday edition of "America's Got Talent" ranked third for the week, with 9.8 million viewers, according to Nielsen Co. figures.

For the week, CBS logged six of the Top 10 programs and led overall in prime time with an average 5.34 million viewers. NBC was second with 4.69 million, followed by ABC with 3.74 million, while Univision had 3.64 million, Fox had 3.24 million, Telemundo had 1.60 million, ION Television had 1.24 million and the CW had 600,000.

USA was the week's most popular cable network, averaging 2.36 million viewers in prime time. Disney Channel had 2.34 million, History had 2.23 million.

NBC's "Nightly News" topped the evening newscasts with an average of 7.8 million viewers. ABC's "World News" was second with 6.9 million and the "CBS Evening News" had 5.9 million viewers.

For the week of July 8-14, the top 10 shows, their networks and viewerships were: "Under the Dome," CBS, 10.709 million; "America's Got Talent" (Wednesday), NBC, 10.707 million; "America's Got Talent," (Tuesday), NBC, 9.81 million; "NCIS," CBS, 8.71 million; "The Big Bang Theory," CBS, 8.16 million; "The Bachelorette," ABC, 6.88 million; "Two and a Half Men," CBS, 6.80 million; "60 Million," CBS, 6.44 million; "Big Brother" (Sunday), CBS, 6.27 million; "America's Got Talent (Wednesday, 8 p.m. EDT repeat), NBC, 6.24 million.

___

ABC and Disney Channel are owned by The Walt Disney Co.; CBS is owned by CBS Corp.; CW is a joint venture of Warner Bros. Entertainment and CBS Corp.; Fox is a unit of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc.; NBC, Telemundo and USA are owned by Comcast Corp.; ION Television is owned by ION Media Networks; History is owned by the A&E Television Networks.

___

Online: http://www.nielsen.com

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/dome-still-hit-helping-cbs-win-last-week-202604806.html

ira glass swain match day nene dark shadows trailer nate mcmillan clooney arrested

বৃহস্পতিবার, ১৪ ফেব্রুয়ারী, ২০১৩

Jawbone User Accounts Compromised in Hack

If you use a Jambox, now might be a real good time to change your MyTalk password: Jawbone's servers have been hacked, and a swathe of users have had their details swiped. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/0byFGLA5IRg/jawbone-accounts-compromised

Election 2012 Results polling place washington post comedy central philadelphia eagles obamacare Todd Akin

Shopping and Product Reviews: Best Women's Underwear with ...

Wearing beautiful and comfortable underwear is a basic need for every woman. The reason comes with the fact that comfortable underwear really influences women?s performances in living their activities. Besides, the beautiful underwear must be the best idea for their confidences especially when they are with their husbands. In this case, great underwear with high quality fabrics and charming designs must the best thing to consider based on the aspects above.?

To buy great underwear products is not difficult especially for the ones who have to live tight activities daily. Online underwear stores are ready to provide best products from best brands. However, finding such store could be challenging enough. For this, getting trusted information and recommendation about where to buy the products must be the best option. This is the reason why this article is written.?

If you think that you need to buy some products of best women?s underwear from leading brands such as Triumph bras, you should check the website linked here as my recommendation. The online store provides you various products from different brands with seriously affordable prices. Just click the link and find the best ones for your beautiful body. Don?t forget to inform your friends about the website. ?

Source: http://b1b2kombonganandes.blogspot.com/2013/02/best-womens-underwear-with-affordable.html

Kenneth Branagh Lupe Ontiveros London 2012 China muhammad ali Opening ceremony London 2012 Google Fiber Olympics Schedule 2012

শনিবার, ৯ ফেব্রুয়ারী, ২০১৩

So, how much money does it cost to produce your podcast, and why ...

79489-breaking-bad-breaking-bad

Something happened over the course of the last 48 hours that had many people on the internet questioning the cost of producing a successful podcast, and ever since, I?ve had quite a few people approach me about it. Not too long ago, I wrote an article titled Obsession or Passion?, about my four years of blogging and podcasting here at Sound On Sight. I felt now would be a great time to release a follow up to that piece, and in doing so, I would adress these questions.

How much does it cost to produce the Sound On Sight podcast?

I can?t claim to be an expert in podcasting but I have been doing it for about five years. Between the 350 episodes of the Sound On Sight podcast and 50 Sordid Cinema shows, we will reach our 400th recording next week. And that doesn?t include the Walking Dead Podcast, which I also host, produce and edit, on a separate feed.

The answer to this first question, is however, a bit complicated.

When we started, we were actually a radio show, broadcasting out of CJLO, 1690 AM, here in Montreal. At the time, we were lucky enough to use the station?s equipment to record the show. However, the biggest cost came when we left the station in 2011, after recording 250 episodes. You see, we were in dire need of purchasing equipment so we could build our own recording studio at home. That was one of only two times that we have asked our listeners to help us out financially. The second, and last time, came when we asked for help to get us to the Toronto International Film Festival.

Every podcast is different, and every podcaster uses different services, and every show drives in a different amount of listeners, which uses up a certain amount of bandwidth. So I can only speak for us, but our biggest expense comes with the actual website, and not the podcasts. Our bandwidth is already included with the cost for soundonsight.org, which is why we can afford to have seven shows on our site, regardless of their popularity.

Anyone with an Internet connection and some inexpensive audio equipment can produce a podcast and make it available online. Hence the reason there are thousands of podcasters, ranging from unemployed teenagers to businessmen to celebrities. In order to put your podcast online you either need a website, or you need a podcasting network such as Libsyn. If you are tech savvy, your best getting your own website, and storing the mp3?s there. It would actually be cheaper than paying a monthly fee to a company like Libsyn, and you will be sole proprietor of your show; not to mention you?ll have a website to accompany it. There are plenty of web hosting companies that offer great deals. Unless you have tens of thousands of listeners, you could easily get the needed storage space for all your episodes, and bandwidth combined, for about $5 ? $7 a month. In fact, if you are smart, you can even get unlimited bandwidth. I know, because we had an unlimited plan during our first four years. So for $7 a month, I was able to host The Televerse, The Walking Dead, The Game of Thrones, Sordid Cinema, Doctor Who and the Sound On Sight podcasts, all under one roof, and all billed to me in one invoice.

What if we have too many listeners using too much bandwidth? Wouldn?t that cost a lot?

Again, you just need to shop around and find the right provider. Just check out our stats for one of our shows below. If you think you will reach more downloads in a month?s time, than maybe you should play it safe and try to find unlimited service.

SOSSTATS

And now, to answer the biggest question posed to me lately: Should I donate to a podcast?

This is a silly question. It is your money and thus your decision. If you feel a podcast is worth your hard earned money, than sure donate. As a podcaster, I wouldn?t say no to a donation. It is hard work. My only gripe comes when a podcaster is dishonest about why he or she claims they need donations to keep a show alive and running. Yes, there are costs, but all too often, it seems podcasters throw in the most ridiculous reasons, like handling their cable bill. Nobody is cancelling their internet or cable because you are not willing to pay for their podcast, and these days, Skype and a fairly affordable microphone would do the trick. In fact, when we recorded our show using professional equipment at the station, we actually had to decrease the quality of the file when uploading each episode to our server. Now that we use a simple mic and Skype, we don?t have to decrease the quality, and the end result is the same. The difference in sound is negligible.

Why did we decrease the quality of our mp3?

We also have to consider our listeners, and the amount of bandwidth they are using, especially, if they are like me, and listen on a mobile device. I can?t tell you how many times, I?ve gone over my usage because I listen to far too many podcasts. So the lower the quality, the better it is for a downloader. At the end of the month, those podcasters aren?t helping to pay for my phone bill. So when a very popular website is demanding money for their podcast, ?threatening to shut it down otherwise, I?d just ask you look at all the variables, before feeling guilty about not donating.

What about advertising?

Popular websites with millions of readers more than likely have premium ad deals. Now I know what you are thinking. Most people who listen to podcasts do so through iTunes and never even access the web site, thus never making an impression on the ads appearing on the post. This is very true, which is why I always listen to a podcast on the actual site, and I recommend everyone ditch iTunes and to the same if you want to support a podcast. Just think about how their ad revenue would increase each month, if the thousands of iTunes listeners were driving traffic to their website instead.

I?m no expert in advertising, and if I was, I might just be able to make a profit from our site, but here is what I know.

CPM advertising networks pay according to the number of impressions that the ads displayed on their site generate. CPM stands for Cost per Mille, and it refers to the cost for 1,000 impressions. So if a blog generates 1,000,000 page views monthly displaying an advertising banner with a $1 CPM, the publisher will earn $1000 monthly minus rev share. But premium ads can earn a publisher anywhere from $6 ? 12 for every 1000 impressions. CPM rates vary with the network, the position of the ad and the format, the network, and so on. So if a website has millions of readers, they most likely have a higher CPM rate. So do the math.

If you are a podcaster, and you are going to ask for money, just be honest about why. If you believe you produce a quality show, and it is worth charging for, than state that as a reason. No one has ever has a problem in paying for entertainment.

Have you ever donated to a show or would you?

I?ve only donated to one show, once in my life time, and that show was Filmspotting. Adam puts in so much time in reaching out to his audience, and so I feel he deserves it. I am pretty sure he spends more time with feedback, than actually reviewing films. Filmspotting also delivers a quality product every week, and they are one of the few reasons we started. They are a big inspiration to us all.

If I had the money, I would donate to several podcasts, but unfortunately I am not financially in a position to do so. However, I would never donate to any podcaster that threatens to shutdown their show or demands it for insincere reasons.

I?ve asked Bill Thompson to write an article listing his favorite film podcasts. I recommend looking out for it, since I?m sure you?ll discover quality shows, all worth donating to.

Why don?t you get a sponsor?

The topic has arisen several times in the past few years with my colleague Simon Howell, and the answer is always the same. The podcast is our escape. It is the fun part. If I had to beg for money, I?d prefer to use the actual website as an excuse. You know what?s hard work? Hard work is writing a film review or a 2000 word article. Hard work is editing content and keeping the site running. Recording a podcast is a blast. The last thing I want to do is worry about recording some 60 second spot to promote a product I don?t care much about. As far as donations go: We just don?t feel right about asking our listeners to pay us, to sit around and discuss movies with friends. When we ask, it is because we really need it. With that said, if you want to support our show, simply give us a rating on iTunes or like us on Facebook.

I?m not saying that I am apposed to podcasts asking for donations. I just mentioned above, that I myself donated to Filmspotting, and we?ve asked when needed. All I am saying is, don?t always believe the hype. There are many talented podcasters out there, who are not fortunate enough to host their podcast on an extremely popular website. I like Hollywood films and I like independent cinema. The same applies to podcasts. I support both, but for the right reasons.

So why are you leaving the podcast?

As mentioned above, I love recording the podcast. The problem is, I wear too many hats here at Sound On Sight: Tech support, web design, reviewer, blogger, editor, not to mention recording, editing and producing several podcasts every week. I actually made a huge sacrifice and went unemployed for six months. Why, you ask? In the first four years of running Sound On Sight, I worked a part time and full time job, while in and out of school. The only reason I was able to barely keep up, was because I was lucky enough to work two jobs that allowed me access to the internet at all times. So needless to say, multi-tasking was essential. I took six months off so I could concentrate on improving certain aspects of the website, that I just had no time for in the past. Some of you may have noticed the drastic visual change, but that is just the start of it all. There is plenty you don?t see, and more to come.

I guess after five years, I need a break. I?ve wanted to walk away many times in the past, but I was always searching for someone to take over. Simon is amazing, but he also has too much on his plate. He needs an equal, and so I?ve decided to ask Josh Spiegel, the host of the Mousterpiece Cinema podcast to replace me. Josh has quickly become one of Sound On Sight?s most valuable players, and I know that he will make ten times the host I was. I am confident the show will be safe in his hands.

There are still many unanswered questions. For starters, we are still not yet sure what is happening with our Sordid Cinema series. There is a chance that I will stay onboard to host the show. Either way, I am not leaving the podcast world entirely, as I still have The Walking Dead podcast to record. I guess you can say, I am simply cutting back, in order to concentrate on other things, and hopefully bigger projects, and perhaps, find a way to take Sound On Sight to the next level.

With that said, I?d like to thank each and every listener, co-host and hater. The past five years have been absolutely incredible. We should be posting our 400th recording sometime around Valentine?s Day. It will be heartbreaking for me, but it needs to be done.

Nothing but love,

Ricky D

?

moderntimes3

Back

Source: http://www.soundonsight.org/so-how-much-money-does-it-cost-to-produce-your-podcast-and-why-are-you-leaving/

green party day 26 new hunger games trailer sasquatch david choe national wear red day gunner kiel

HBT: Hill, D-backs agree to $35M extension

Three weeks after Aaron Hill and the Diamondbacks were said to be having preliminary extension talks the two sides have agreed to a deal, with Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com reporting that Hill will get $35 million for three seasons.

Hill signed a two-year, $11 million deal last offseason and would have become a free agent after this season, so it?s easy to see how much his leverage increased following a year in which the second baseman hit .302 with 26 homers, 44 doubles, and an .882 OPS in 156 games while playing his usual stellar defense.

Hill was terrible in his final season-and-a-half in Toronto, allowing Arizona to acquire him at a discount in mid-2011, but he?s been fantastic for the Diamondbacks with a .304 batting average and .881 OPS in 189 total games.

Arizona was able to keep the commitment relatively short?Hill will be 34 years old when the deal ends?and $11.667 million per season is similar to the average annual value in recent deals for fellow second basemen Brandon Phillips and Dan Uggla.

Source: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/02/08/aaron-hill-diamondbacks-agree-to-35-million-extension/related/

nicklas backstrom discovery shuttle allure jane goodall saturday night fever glamping forgetting sarah marshall

Auto Title Loans And Rent-To-Own Centers: What's Better?

Auto title loan lenders and rent-to-own centers may have seen an upsurge in business with the Baltimore Ravens facing off against the San Francisco 49ers in the year's biggest football game. One out of every two households in America is said to have watched Superbowl XLVII, rooting on their team with painted faces and a plate full of food. An estimated 7.5 million fans went out and purchased new TV's specifically to watch the game. With the average price of a big screen TV costing anywhere from $500-$3500, consumers whose cash flow didn't support their spending had to get creative with their purchasing options.

Some may have chosen to take out an auto title loan based on the value and equity of their car or truck. With lenders offering up to $5000, there's plenty of wiggle room to purchase that flat-screen or Plasma. It' a hefty price to pay, though, if the borrower can't repay the loan with their next paycheck, or within the 1-3 month time period that the lenders give to repay. Borrowing $1000 will cost around $200 in loan fees not to mention paying high interest rates should the loan be "rolled-over" due to the debtor's inability to make their payments. That is if it's paid back right away. It more time is needed, fees and interest alone could surpass the original amount of the loan. If the borrower can pay back quickly, the hit to their wallet may not be as devastating. If the borrower goes into default, the auto title lender can go as far as repossessing the car.

Those who don't want to hand over the title to their automobile in the midst of football fever may have taken the rent-to-own road, giving them the option to make payments on their newly acquired game gadget. That same $1000 TV could end up costing thousands, though, should the renter get stuck in a cycle of "buying-over-time".

So what is the best way to go when wanting to make a large purchase? An auto title loan that potentially puts your car at risk of being repossessed or renting-own-own which could send you into payment pandemonium? Either way, you may be setting yourself up for a financial dilemma if you can't afford to make payments on your newly acquired merchandise.

Be sure to consider the pro's and cons of both before you make a commitment. If you rent-to-own your TV you will make monthly payments that may be more suitable to your budget but in the long run could wreak havoc on your bank account. You will eventually own the TV outright and won't have to worry about your credit score when applying because rent-to-own stores typically loan to anyone. On the flip side, it could take years to pay off that TV which means you could end up spending three times as much as the TV is worth. Not to mention, if you default on your payments, the store has the option to take back your TV.

If you choose to utilize an auto title lender to get the cash you need in order to go out and purchase the TV, you won't have to worry about your credit history being a factor in the approval process. Title lenders don't require a credit check. You will get the cash overnight in most cases and will own the TV outright once it's purchased. The risky part comes if you can't pay back your loan when the lender requires. In most cases you will have one-three months to make good on your loan but if you default, the lender has the right to repossess your car. That's a hefty price to pay for watching your beloved team try to reach #1 NFL status.

In either case, you may be taking too much of a risk just to have that larger than life viewing device. When it comes time to make a large purchase, take a good look at your budget and consider whether or not you are in the position to not only borrow, but to repay. The long term consequences of your short-term desires could come back to tackle you and your wallet.

Source: http://joe-holbrook.blogspot.com/2013/02/auto-title-loans-and-rent-to-own.html

proposition 8 ricky martin larry bird chauncey billups caucus results exton kurt warner

শুক্রবার, ৮ ফেব্রুয়ারী, ২০১৩

What genes behind dog facial features tell us

Jeff Schoenebeck

Dog species (Canis familiaris) have vastly different skull shapes, from the pug (foreground) to the gray wolf (background). Studies of the genetics that control these shapes could apply to humans, too, scientists say.

By Tanya Lewis
LiveScience

Thanks to human breeders, dogs exhibit an impressive variety of skull shapes. Studying the genes that determine these shapes could provide insight into human skull development and craniofacial disorders, scientists say.

In a new study, scientists detail the biological and historical origins of dog skull shapes, highlighting some of the genetic developments that gave rise to different breeds.

"Sometime during the Paleolithic," the researchers write in the February issue of the journal Genetics, "a remarkable transformation occurred. Small numbers of gray wolves adopted a new pack master ? humans." Over the years, dog fanciers and breeders have tinkered with those canines so much that more than 400 dog breeds exist today worldwide.

Much of the variation is in skull characteristics.?"Dogs can serve as a model for skull growth and shape determination, because the genetic conservation between dogs and humans makes it highly likely that craniofacial development is regulated similarly between both species," study co-author Jeffrey Schoenebeck of the National Institutes of Health said in a statement. [See The 10 Most Popular Dog Breeds]

From the "pushed-in" face of a bulldog to the elongated snout of the Afghan, dog craniums run the gamut. Skull shape genetics is complex, and multiple genes are often involved. Researchers have begun to pick apart the genes that are responsible for shapes that resemble human conditions such as brachycephaly (a flattened head) and dolichocephaly (an elongated head).

Researchers also have?studied traits that fit neither description, such as the Chihuahua's?rounded skull or the bull terrier's downward angled muzzle. By comparing genetic variations among these skull shapes, the team can tease out which genes may be responsible for a flattened head, for instance.

While the researchers note wryly, "the dog model is young in human years," they say that understanding these genes and their interactions might help explain craniofacial defects in humans.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/08/16900138-what-genes-behind-dog-facial-features-can-tell-us?lite

Katherine Webb Cut for Bieber AJ McCarron Johnny Manziel ups Aj Mccarron Girlfriend linkedin